Rindis.com

This is a good look at the Revolutionary War in 1781 in a popular history style. It is marred by a click-bait title, and a blurb that really tries to oversell the subject (not in importance, but calling Yorktown ‘overlooked’ is irresponsible at best), but the content is good. It also continues a trend of an in medias res intro presenting the most ‘exciting’ bit of the climax that I’m getting very tired of.

But the overall thrust of the book is well-handled. At the beginning of 1781, the Continental Army had been promised help from France that had yet to amount to much. Washington had come to see that control of the sea was going to be essential to any successful prosecution of the war, and the French navy had yet to manage much on that either. There’s a very good section on Arnold leading a force in ravaging much of Virginia and cutting off supplies to Continental troops in Carolina. And an attempt was made to contain him and force a battle and defeat his force.

This ends with Arnold getting away to sea, but until that point, it’s basically a dry-run for the Yorktown campaign. This is hammered home a little too often in the text, but certainly an interesting point. The idea of the ‘gamble’ of the title is that Washington is gambling that the French navy could actually hold the Virginia coast long enough to trap Cornwallis. But it doesn’t come off as that much of a gamble. Is it sure? No. Is Washington really out anything by trying? Not so much. He was working on a siege/assault of New York, that was canceled in favor of moving to Virginia, but that was unlikely to have gone far.

There’s an interesting look at what everyone’s writing when, and Rochambeau’s behind-the scenes steering of focus from New York to Virginia. There’s also a look at the breakdown of British communications, and Cornwalis’ decision to abandon the Carolinas in favor of Virginia.

In all, it’s an engaging look at the 1781 campaigns, and does a good job with sorting out all the various activities separated by long distances. It does not lose focus, and juggles multiple theaters very well.

Alan Taylor admits straight-up in the introduction that he took a very expansive view of the subject of the first volume of Penguin’s History of the United States series. Geographically, he looks at all of North America, rather than just the broad swath that would become part of the US. Time-wise… well, he does start with the initial migrations across the Bering Strait, but naturally doesn’t spend that much time with the spread of humanity across the continent and the changes that wrought. But he does talk about the subject before moving on to the arrival of Europeans from across the Atlantic.

In general, this is the usual ‘colonial’ focus, with the book winding down once the United States forms (though the last section covers the California coast and Hawaii up to about 1800). The main point of the increased geographical scope is to show the various European projects of conquest and/or settlement, and how they played out differently, or against each other. Regions are looked at in large blocks in the text, which partially undercuts the point, as some relationships end up scattered about, but mostly it works.

Part of why it works is that North America wasn’t any sort of unified place from native or European viewpoints in the period, so several stories play out more-or-less independently. They also provide meaningful compare and contrast examples, especially for the Eastern Seaboard colonies. Those sections are split up by the original English administering of them, and explains how the modern states were originally grouped before being split into separate colonies later (a sequence never adequately mentioned, much less explained, in other histories I’ve seen).

The general thesis through most of the book is how European powers tried to control this new continent, but the ability to have things go the way planned always fell far short of the plans. Past this, there is a good amount of explanation of how native agriculture worked in various regions, and how European settlers inevitably disrupted these patterns, starting the cycle of friction that was only downward as exposure to European diseases rapidly diminished native populations.

Taylor is also at great pains to point out that this was nearly as much a problem for early Spanish authorities, since the main plan was to make use of the huge pool of labor they had conquered… and was now dying off. This leads to needing to import labor, and Taylor goes into the economic process where slave labor crowds out indentured labor (which was more than bad enough). Much of the latter half looks at how various regions evolved slightly differently under these pressures.

There’s a fair number of conflicts during this period, and I don’t think they’re well served here. Conflicts between Europeans and natives, like Metacomet’s War, are well-enough handled, but any conflict between European powers feels more glossed over, even within the limitations of such an overview, with some exception for the British conquest of the Dutch colonies.

This is, of course, and overview, and has to be fairly succinct in any subject, but this is definitely a new standard in overviews of the period, and an excellent start to Penguin’s series.

This is a close look at about fifteen years that changed much of the structures of Europe in a popular history format. In a way, it is “Here I Stand the book”, though it only covers a fraction of the period that game did. But they both show just how many things that we hear about in disjointed fashion in histories were all happening at the same time.

Technically, the primary focus is meant to be the clash between Charles V and Suleiman, featuring the fall of Hungary, Rhodes, and the first siege of Vienna. However, even with the siege of Vienna near the end, this thread feels less than well-served. And of course, there’s plenty else to keep track of, and the real success of this book is that it juggles all these balls without dropping any, and presenting a clear narrative.

This includes western European power politics (the book starts with Charles V’s visits to England as part of an effort to keep Henry VIII from playing nice with France), and the start of the Reformation (with a good look at Luther’s evolving thinking, and his efforts to stay at the center of what he had started). There’s plenty of side notes as part of all these, with wars between European powers, fighting in North Africa, and in Persia. One of the threads that Reston tries to follow (fairly well, if at a thankfully very high level) are the various efforts for religious uniformity, and the compromises forced on various leaders.

Overall, the book is well-written and put together. There are complaints about a lack of footnotes, which is justified, though this is enough on the popular history side that it is not a major concern. There is a selected bibliography at the end that runs ~10 pages, but is just the normal bare bones format, when a ‘further reading’ list would have helped make up for the lack of footnoting.