Rindis.com

All my hobbies, all the time
  • Home
  • My Blog
  • Games
  • History

Categories

  • Books (485)
  • Comics (10)
  • Gaming (906)
    • Boardgaming (665)
      • ASL (153)
      • CC:Ancients (82)
      • F&E (78)
        • BvR – The Wind (26)
        • Four Vassal War (9)
        • Konya wa Hurricane (17)
        • Second Wind (5)
      • SFB (78)
    • Computer games (160)
      • MMO (76)
    • Design and Effect (6)
    • RPGs (66)
      • D&D (25)
        • O2 Blade of Vengeance (3)
      • GURPS (32)
  • History (10)
  • Life (82)
    • Conventions (9)
  • News (29)
  • Technology (6)
  • Video (48)
    • Anime (46)
  • Writing (1)

Patreon

Support Rindis.com on Patreon!
Become a patron at Patreon!

Other blogs:

RSS Inside GMT

  • Meet the Xiongnu: A Civilization of GMT’s Ancient Civilizations of East Asia February 6, 2026

RSS Playing at the World

  • Playing at the World 2E V2 Arrives May 5, 2025

RSS Dyson’s Dodecahedron

  • The Flying Swine – A Fine Drinking Establishment February 6, 2026

RSS Quest for Fun!

  • The Myth of Rational Animals November 23, 2025

RSS Bruce Heard and New Stories

  • WWII Aviation Industry Part 4 August 11, 2025

RSS Chicago Wargamer

  • The 2 Half-Squads - Episode 310: Cruising Through Crucible of Steel January 27, 2023

RSS CRRPG Addict

  • Star Trail: Because It's There February 5, 2026
SF&F blogs:

RSS Fantasy Cafe

  • Strange Horizons Roundtable on Influence January 26, 2026

RSS Lynn’s Book Blog

  • Friday Face Off: Daniel Pursglove Series by KJ Maitland February 6, 2026
ASL blogs:

RSS Sitrep

  • Blockhaus Rock April 1, 2025

RSS Hong Kong Wargamer

  • FT114 Yellow Extract After Action Report (AAR) Advanced Squad Leader scenario April 16, 2025

RSS Hex and Violence

  • This still exists? March 25, 2025

RSS Grumble Jones

  • Grumble Jones February Scenario GJ157 February 2, 2026

RSS Desperation Morale

  • How to Learn ASL March 16, 2025

RSS Banzai!!

  • October North Texas Gameday October 21, 2019

RSS A Room Without a LOS

  • [Crossing the Moro CG] T=0902 -- Rough start July 18, 2015
GURPS blogs:

RSS Dungeon Fantastic

  • Black Company Playtest: Summer of Riots January 27, 2026

RSS Gaming Ballistic

  • Mission X: Obviously Not 2025. Life happened, read on. December 13, 2025

RSS Ravens N’ Pennies

RSS Let’s GURPS

  • Review: GURPS Realm Management March 29, 2021

RSS No School Grognard

  • It came from the GURPS forums: Low-Tech armor and fire damage January 29, 2018

RSS The Collaborative Gamer

  • Thoughts on a Town Adventures System January 18, 2022

RSS Don’t Forget Your Boots

  • GURPS Supers Newport Academy #2: “Jailbreak” January 4, 2026

RSS Orbs and Balrogs

  • Bretwalda - Daggers of Oxenaforda pt.4 - Fallen King May 27, 2017

Advanced Thracian City States

by Rindis on June 21, 2009 at 6:34 pm
Posted In: Boardgaming

Well… today was meant to be a playtest of the game Metropolis (about the rise of the Greek city-states), but I haven’t received all my playtest materials yet. So, we went to Plan B: Advanced Civilization. Sadly, Zjonni has two finals to take tomorrow, and, I think, a paper to write, so he could not make it, leaving us with only 5.

The five-player game cuts off one of the four map panels (in this case the west side), and reduces the number of tokens available to each player a little. After randomly drawing for choosing priority, I took Egypt, Patch took Babylon (which he had last time), Jason took Thrace, Mark took Assyria, and Dave took Crete (the only power in play that hadn’t been last time).

The opening was pretty standard. I deliberately bounced once on the early Bronze Age so that I’d be in better shape in the longer term. I moved west into the rest of Africa, wanting to get to the available city site early, and of course north-east through the Sinai to establish a buffer zone. Relations with Patch were pretty good the entire game, my biggest problems were actually with Crete.

Things developed a bit slowly in Europe and Asia Minor. Jason used Thrace’s late AST barriers to keep a higher population early and took over Greece before Crete really got going. Assyria was perhaps a bit slow, and western Anatolia remained something of a vacuum for quite a while.

As things got going, Babylon took the brunt of the initial wave of calamities, as Patch had at least one for 4-5 turns in a row. Thrace pretty much took no damage. Considering that Jason is always a very able player, and is more practiced with Civ than the rest of us at this point, I… was not happy with the results. It’s not that I wasn’t doing well, but keeping up with him was difficult. And then I had about three to four turns of nasty calamities in a row. I took a Civil War early, with the second faction going to Dave/Crete. I eventually threw him out (except for one small little colony that I didn’t worry about much), but this was delayed by being the primary victim of an Epidemic. I finally knocked out the Cretan city that was in my territory just in time—Dave had a Flood that turn.

Finally, Crete was hit by a Civil War, and I was the beneficiary. This gave me back what was left, and gave me a city on Cyprus that I kept to the end of the game. This put me back in a good position, and I could do something about getting somewhere in the game.

We had a hard limit of 5 PM again, but we definitely got further this time around, and the game flowed more smoothly. Jason and I both broke the Early Iron Age barrier on the last turn. In fact I’d done fairly well, getting to eight cities, and trading away Epidemic to Jason (second time I drew that card!). Sadly, I caught Treachery in return (the second time he hit me with that—but there’s only so many trading partners for the high-value cards). If not for losing that city to him (which he reduced) I would have barely beat him. As it was, I was a mere 36 points behind him in second (inflating my score with the deepest discount purchases I could manage helped). I think we squeezed out two extra turns or so.

Egypt and Babylon (deservedly) get all the press for being the easiest positions, but I must say at this point that Thrace is actually very powerful. Some of it depends on just how much crowding is going on the northern side, but that’s true of any position. With any sort of real room, the late AST barriers really allow you to plan what you’re doing.

Final Scores:

Side Player AST Cities Civ Cards Cards Treasury Total Place
Thrace Jason 1100 200 720 8 4 2032 1
Crete Dave 1000 150 375 20 0 1545 5
Assyria Mark 900 200 560 5 13 1678 4
Babylon Patch 900 400 455 4 16 1775 3
Egypt Rindis 1000 350 630 13 5 1998 2

We still need to work out the next meet, but we’ll probably try for Metropolis… if possible.

└ Tags: AdCiv, gaming
 Comment 

Certain Destruction Awaits

by Rindis on May 24, 2009 at 7:32 pm
Posted In: Boardgaming

Had Mark over today to try out Stonewall’s Last Battle. It’s part of the Great Campaigns of the American Civil War series, which has a pretty good reputation. Also, there’s a new game for it due out for the first time in almost a decade, so I’ve been wondering how anxious I really am to get it.

This particular one is on the Chancellorsville campaign, where the Union nearly surprised Lee, and then let him take the initiative (never a wise move in the vicinity of Lee…).

Today’s fight didn’t go nearly so well for the South. I took the Confederates in scenario 5, the first of the advanced scenarios. I’d borrowed Mark’s copy last month so I could familiarize myself with the rules ahead of time, which also put me in the position of teaching the Advanced rules to Mark. (He’s only managed a solo trial session before this point; which I also did before today.) It’s pretty much the full battle, starting with Hooker getting his left flank over the Rapidan on April 30.

Teaching and getting through the first couple turns took us the bulk of the day. The game is not horribly complex (though there’s a passel of game-specific exceptions in each one, that I hope they find a way to tone down at some point). Part of the problem is just a very procedure-heavy approach to the rules, and further familiarity would speed things up quite a bit.

At any rate, the Confederates begin with a bunch of restrictions on the first day that limits their ability to respond. The game started with some cavalry skirmishing as I tried to figure out how to slow down the approaching Union troops. I threw what I did have available in his way, but not with much success (even lost a complete brigade).

The second day presented a lot more action. I pulled out the bulk of Jackson’s Corps from around Fredricksburg and attempted to face off with the three approaching corps. Partially due to poor initiative rolls, this was a lot more piecemeal than it needed to be, and Mark promptly wrecked a couple divisions with combined assaults. Part of this was also due to not being able to figure out what to do to get a good defensive position.

As the turn went on, I pulled parts of my forces out the actual entrenchments around Fredricksburg to shore up the rapidly crumbling west. I hoped that what I left would be enough to prevent a Union breakthrough there. More or less in vain. He then attacked out of Fredricksburg and cleared about half the fortifications. At the end of May 1st, there were a lot of Union troops that were going to be too worn out to get too far (hopefully), but the XII Corps was just getting up, and I was in much the same state.

Obviously, good Confederate play is necessary to get far, and I’m a long ways from figuring that out. Also, there is still a ways to go in the scenario, and it has pretty stringent VP requirements for the Union. However, I don’t know how I could have really patched a line together, and (hopefully) managed a counterattack in the interest of keeping the situation from completely falling apart over the next couple days.

So, a fairly convincing win from Mark, and he’s looking at trying out a couple of different short games next time around.

└ Tags: gaming, GCACW
 Comment 

A Plague Upon Both Your Parties

by Rindis on May 17, 2009 at 6:54 pm
Posted In: Boardgaming

Had the gang over again for gaming. With this many people, it’s not really possible to change dates at the last moment. So, of course, today is the high point of a little heat wave going though the area. And we rent a place where we aren’t allowed to have a wall-mounted air-conditioner.

However, we have two decent freestanding ones, and with both of them working together the temperature stayed quite reasonable.

Zjonni has just finished moving, and came down ill during that, and is still recovering from both. So we only had five of the group over today, which was a second playing of Russian Civil War, which we were happy with the last time we played it, so Dave, Patch and I went for it again with Mark and Jason joining in this time.

This time the White Russian forces were pretty evenly split amongst the five of us (as were the Politburo markers). Given that there’d be little chance of multiple people trying for a White win, it looked like the Red Party was the way to go. The problem with that was, that I’d gotten an even split of White and Red leaders, and the only leader I had worth more than a ‘1’ was one of the White leaders (a ‘3’). No one was really wanting to do a pre-game trade, but I eventually talked Dave into giving up the other White ‘3’ for a Politburo marker. Since everyone had 2 or 3, and this just swapped which of the two of us only had two markers, I felt I wasn’t giving up much while gaining something that I might be able to affect the game with.

At first, the game seemed to be going in what should be the typical direction, with power bases consolidating, and many of the peripheral units getting eliminated. This is a process that decidedly favors the Reds. However, the random events were mostly coming up as plagues that did a good job decimating everyone. Jason got control of the Finns early, who promptly came down into Petrograd to limit the Mark’s powerbase… incidentally killing Lenin and preventing Red reinforcements for the turn in the process.

This changed the complexion of the game considerably. I had managed to bag several minor Red leaders in my turn, but it was mostly to try and level the playing field as I didn’t have much to play with on that side of the divide. The second turn was mostly more of the same, with more nasty plagues and the Finnish army continuing to hold Petrograd, and no one willing to try and tackle the juggernaut. I was a little surprised that Jason decided to keep the units there as I didn’t properly realize the score in White VPs he was accumulating by picking off Red leaders with the Finns.

With no Red replacements for two turns, the playing field was becoming much more level, though the attrition of White leaders started insuring that active White forces were shrinking as all the available units could not be controlled. Petrograd finished the third turn with Finnish and Red units present, so they finally got replacements. This, I thought, might doom my chances at engineering a White victory, as my remaining Red units had already been knocked out, without me ever getting VPs out of them. Jason was getting the ‘green meanie’ award, since he’d gotten control of the Finns, Baltic states, and Belorussians.

And I came up with a minor tactical innovation: I moved a White army to a Red stack and attempted an assassination. If it failed, I could sit and allow him to chance the low-odds attack (or just leave…), if it worked I could uncontroll the Red ‘6’ combat unit and attack a much weaker player stack. Thankfully, I rolled high. Assassins had been largely sitting idle, but they became much more popular after that.

Eventually, the game boiled down to just a few leader stacks available, and my remaining White ‘3’ leader gave me a fairly dominant position, even with the high-value Red units that were back in service. Trotsky died during turn four, so the Reds were again without replacements. Both Patch and Jason had pretty much lost they’re Red units, forcing them to try for White VPs and a White win if they wished to continue to influence events. At the very end of turn 5, the last Red leader was eliminated, ending the game with a White Victory immediately thereafter.

Player White Red
Rindis 51 11
Jason 40 21
Dave 33 51
Patch 29 10
Mark 1 10

I hadn’t expected this result, and as can be seen, Mark got stomped on pretty hard early, and I never got anywhere with my Red forces. Jason had actually gotten more Red kills than I had, my lead was from having more White units available, and from getting control of the gold at the end of the game (it changed hands twice on the last turn).

Everyone had a good time, and I can say it looks like the game holds up well to repeated playings. Also, the extra chaos of 5 instead of 4 players was a big help to the game.

Next time, we’re looking at doing a playtest of Metropolis, a game of the rise of the Greek city-states 8th-5th centuries BC.

└ Tags: gaming, Russian Civil War
 Comment 

Revolting Edessa

by Rindis on April 26, 2009 at 4:46 pm
Posted In: Boardgaming

Had Mark over today for more gaming (this is three weekends in a row with someone…). Today was his pick, and he had decided he was interested in seeing the Third Crusade scenario from Onward Christian Soldiers, which was more than fine by me, as I think it’s a good scenario.

It was a rough start, as it’s been a bit since either of us has played, and we also had to remember not to confuse the issue with Carthage which can be similar.

One critical bit that didn’t hit me (the Saracens) at first was that Saladin starts under the onus of a rule where he has to have half his available forces with him, which he doesn’t. I could either sit in front of Acre as the Crusaders besieged it, unable to do much, and try to get reinforcements there, or leave and seek out those same reinforcements.

(The first try before we realized just how unbalanced his command structure was, saw Saladin attack the Crusaders twice and drive them away with good die rolls.)

I went seeking reinforcements, and was approaching the 50% mark, when a revolt broke out in Edessa, requiring my immediate attention. (Really immediate—I pick up Saladin and 10 SPs and move him all the way across the map to Edessa.) This pretty well froze me in place for a turn as nothing was set up for this. And two turns later it happened again, when I’d only gotten half way back and was still gathering a new force together.

So, while Saladin was gone, Acre was still besieged. Richard took Cyprus and then landed at Tortosa and quickly took it as well. Acre fell about the fourth turn, after siege attrition had got the garrison where it could be assaulted more easily. (An interesting note, about this time we had a turn where there was only one successful continuation roll. Slowed everybody down.) After this, Crusader attention turned to Jaffa, where Saladin had been gathering his army together. Also around this time, Saldin’s trusted subordinate, Taki ed-Din Omar, was killed by Assassins (further paralyzing my command).

I was actually able to sally during the siege of Jaffa with a minor leader and narrowly win the battle, causing the siege to temporarily end. As winter got closer, I realized the army there was way too vulnerable, and I planned to carry the force out by sea to safety, until something better could be arranged. So, in my biggest mistake of the game, I neglected to have my fleet marker be my automatic first activation after winning the initiative!

Jaffa fell, and with it went about 1/3 of the Saracen forces (and another leader). I managed to take some revenge by driving the Crusader fleet out of Acre Sea Zone, and then Saladin arrived to ravage the countryside around Acre, and retake it at the end of the turn. The Crusader army reconvened at the gates of Jerusalem, where Philip I decided he’d had enough and went home.

During winter 1190, Jerusalem was taken (for the second time) by Crusaders from Europe. Duke Hugh of Burgundy immediately set out to re-establish contact with the coast, as Jaffa had come under siege by Saracens coming up from Egypt. Marching around several strongholds, he took the town of Haifa (exactly 10 attrition points away from Jerusalem). Meanwhile, Saladin fell ill in Acre, not allowing him to isolate the Crusaders in the interior.

So, it was another Crusader auto-victory, though this one was much earlier. At first, Mark was worried about how to deal with Saladin, and the large force he was gathering. The events conspired against me, and he took advantage of every one. I could have done better even so, my play just did not rise up to the challenge presented.

It may be a while before we get together again, Mark has a socially busy month coming up. When we do get together, it will be for some-scenario-or-other of Stonewall Jackson’s Last Battle.

└ Tags: gaming, Onward Christian Soldiers
 Comment 

The Far-flung Babylonian Empire

by Rindis on April 19, 2009 at 7:03 pm
Posted In: Boardgaming

Had six people over for a game of Advanced Civilization today. New record for attendance (and pushing the limits of what can be hosted)! The setup was interesting as we used my Civilization set for the board and counters, and Jason’s for the cards and AST (which are the parts that get replaced in AdCiv…). Anyway, Patch and Zjonni had never played before, while the rest of us hadn’t played in years… decades even.

No one had any particular preference for a particular power, so we gave Babylon to Patch and Egypt to Zjonni, as they tend to be very forgiving powers, and then we ended up with Jason taking Africa, Dave Assyria, Mark Italy, and I took Thrace.

That last worked out very well for me, as Thrace has a forgiving AST sequence, and there was no Illyria or Crete to butt heads with. I wish the first part was intentional, I honestly hadn’t looked. The placement, of course, was very intentional.

One of the things that makes Civilization such a great game to pick up and play is the fact that despite a fair number of different things going on, the game starts very simply, and you work up to the rest of the rulebook. So you get a chance to get used to different parts of the rules at a time. Everyone had a blast, and is more than up for doing it again, soon.

For most of the game, Asia was fairly quiet with Assyria, Babylon and Egypt coming to good agreements on borders and keeping to them. Since Assyria had something of a slow start, having to muck around with figuring out what to do for city sites, this overall worked out well for Babylon, which eventually even colonized Crete (!).

Africa kept busy poking at both its borders, generally nothing decisive with Egypt, but plenty of fighting over Sicily and south Italy with the Italians, which I was happy to see. A bad combination of disasters caused trouble for the entire area, and Egypt and Africa had a hard time recovering. Italy had never managed to get very far at all.

All of this, and the generous AST gave me a good start. I rapidly moved west and then south, generating a buffer area and then colonizing Greece. The buffer held in the north-west corner for a good half the game, when I had purposely delayed some city building to maximize population. As I got to the point where I was building and supporting a good number of cities, the buffer zone collapsed and Mark was slowly forcing me back along the Danube into my primary coastal areas.

I got to 8 cities at one point (and only Babylon had beaten me to that), but then calamities kept knocking them down faster than I can rebuild them. Patch is very good at trading, and did not take too many calamities (hey, I tried!).

Since we knew we had a time-limit coming up, the last turn got strange. Egypt managed to invade Crete, knock out both Babylonian cities there, and build new Egyptian ones there (aided by the fact that Patch only had two markers in his Stock, and therefore couldn’t fight much once the cities were broken). Egypt shot up to nine cities from about five in one turn. I didn’t think enough about the fact of the last turn, or else I could have built one more city than I did.

Long-term, Babylon was in the best shape, as he had just gotten the nine cards to get into the early Iron Age and was moving forward on the AST again. I needed another turn or two to get there. Egypt had been stuck in the early Bronze Age until the last turn….

Final Scores:

Side Player AST Cities Civ Cards Cards Treasury Total Place
Africa Jason 800 250 175 4 6 1235 5
Italy Mark 700 100 105 18 3 926 6
Thrace Rindis 1000 200 510 0 0 1710 2
Assyria Dave 900 250 220 21 16 1407 4
Babylon Patch 1000 250 700 0 0 1950 1
Egypt Zjonni 600 450 560 0 0 1610 3

We still need to work out the details, but we’re planning on the next session being in a month, and will likely be another go-round with Russian Civil War, this time with six players.

└ Tags: AdCiv, gaming
 Comment 
  • Page 270 of 308
  • « First
  • «
  • 268
  • 269
  • 270
  • 271
  • 272
  • »
  • Last »

©2005-2026 Rindis.com | Powered by WordPress with ComicPress | Hosted on Rindis Hobby Den | Subscribe: RSS | Back to Top ↑