Rindis.com

Despite the title, this isn’t focused on Radetzky. (But it is a great take off of Johann Strauss’ celebration of the campaign.)

At the start of 1848, revolution swept through Paris—again. And this time, much of the rest of Europe caught revolutionary fever as well. In particular, much of northern Italy went into a ferment that became the First War for Independence, and this book is focused on the military aspects of this.

It really helps if you have some grounding in the period and the Austrian army. There is a small glossary in the back that explains, for instance, that “FML” is “Feldmarshall-Lieutenant”, or Lieutenant General, but in the text it’s never explained, while the abbreviation shows up many times there, and again, the glossary is buried in the back (and there’s a lot for it to be buried beneath). Thankfully, I’ve read enough Napoleonic materials to know this already.

The main part of the book looks as if it should be a detailed, but readable, history of the campaigns of 1848 and 1849, but that’s not really the purpose. There are a decent number of maps, but not enough for some detailed movements over terrain thoroughly unfamiliar to most English-speaking readers. But, this is really a detailed analysis of the campaigns. Not only do we get detailed descriptions of many of the battles and skirmishes (quoting eyewitness accounts where possible), but constant referrals to losses as recorded in unit histories and returns.

So, this is actually a very detailed resource, and if someone wanted to, say, design a wargame on the subject, this would be an excellent one-stop starting point for a design. Added to this detail-oriented history is the fact that there are twenty-one appendixes, mostly giving orders of battle and numbers of troops of various armies at various points.

As a readable history of the First Italian War of Independence, it is lackluster. The writing is not up to helping you juggle all the details that get thrown at you. As an advanced study of a subject already somewhat familiar, I imagine it would do much better. But a more casual reader needs to at least be cautious.