Rindis.com

Stephen Douglas was a very able speaker and politician on what turned out to be the losing side of history, is mostly remembered for being Abraham Lincoln’s foil (or more properly, the other way around). Enough so, that basic history textbooks will go into the Lincoln-Douglas debates, even though they don’t have time to mention much else about him.

This book goes all in on this, tracing both careers from their initial arrival in Illinois, to Douglas’ death in 1861.

It’s a good idea, and you certainly learn a lot, but their careers are not quite as tightly coupled as needed to make it the best format.

So, it’s a pair of parallel biographies at the general history level. There’s not a bunch of detailed analysis of their lives and speeches, but all the basics are there. Morris seems fairly evenhanded in his treatment, though he shows Lincoln coming off far worse in the main Lincoln-Douglas debates than you generally hear in less detailed books. Certainly, Lincoln is shown with many of his problems here, though I think some more attention to the change in tone of Lincoln’s politics going into the 1850s would have been very useful.

Of course, part of the lack of digging into detail is that everything leading up to the Kansas-Nebraska Act is about a third of the book, while the remaining two thirds concentrates on the fallout over the next six years. This keeps it from being the extensive background book you might expect, and undermines the “thirty year struggle” idea given in the subtitle.